Now that "the dust has settled" on the Goldscheider v Royal Opera House decision in the Court of Appeal in May, I am pleased to have this article published in Apil's PI Focus. In it I consider the implications of the case outside noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) cases, and in particular the inferences as to causation it is open to a court to draw, and which arguably the court should draw, when an employer has failed to assess and act against risk of injury to his/her/its workers.
| less than a minute read
/Passle/5b3f2cb9780ebf0410d034b3/MediaLibrary/Images/62cbdb4cf636e90f90cbb708/2023-11-16-15-35-05-870-655636a93d4d3db2aa2b7272.jpg)
/Passle/5b3f2cb9780ebf0410d034b3/MediaLibrary/Images/62cbdb4cf636e90f90cbb708/2024-03-04-14-15-30-077-65e5d782047da683cd0a542f.png)
/Passle/5b3f2cb9780ebf0410d034b3/MediaLibrary/Images/62cbdb4cf636e90f90cbb708/2023-12-01-17-45-47-680-656a1bcbc939f53538e0fca7.jpg)